ITIL® and Me

In the trenches with ITIL and ITSM.

Browsing Posts published by Michael

Just like every other IT blogger out there, it’s time for my “goodbye to 2011” post.  So here goes…

See ya 2011, don’t let the door hit ya on the way out!

Did you really expect anything more from me?  I think I posted pretty much the same thing last year; no recaps, no disappointing blog posts, no lamenting on how 2011 was supposed to be the year of (fill in the blank).  It’s over.  Done.  Kaput.

Unlike last year though, I don’t plan to post any goals or predictions on 2012.  Sure, the common buzzwords are still going strong and I’m sure we’ll see more adoption of cloud computing, social media, gamification etc., etc., but I’m not a Forrester or Gartner analyst.  I’m just out there working in IT Service Management and honestly, adding one to the year won’t cause a sudden shift in my IT life.

Oh wait, I forgot.  I do predict that the world will not end in 2012.  Sorry to crush your Mayan prophecy hopes.

What do most people say when they take their company down the path of ITIL or ITSM?  It’s “We’re adopting ITIL” or “We’re adopting IT Service Management.”  Point being, the phrase “adoption” is commonly used.  A few months ago I had a great laugh with my itSMF colleagues over that particular phrase.  Someone even wanted to start saying “We need to get away from adoption.  Let’s call it foster parenting ITSM initiatives.”  The more I thought about the phrasing, the more I actually liked to coin “adoption” as implementing ITIL.  To explain why, I need to give a little bit of background of my own history.

I’ve survived an actual adoption process.  And I say survive in more of the sense that it was tough, but with a very good result.  I won’t go into details since this isn’t a support forum, but I will say that it’s got a lot of similarities like that of working in ITSM.  Work is slow, difficult, taxing, and there are many high points as well as low ones throughout the entire process.  In fact, there are several weeks of work in the beginning, followed by several months of a lull, shortly followed by (sometimes only a few) days of last minute preparations in anticipation of the “big event.”    Even when the go-live day comes, there are always last minute changes, some of which can turn out to be catastrophic in which the go-live date gets pushed back.  Even after changes are implemented into production, there’s a period of post go-live support and minor corrections are put into place to better help the organization adopt the changes.  After another specified amount of time, it’s probably safe to say the adoption has been finalized and now IT is one big happy family.

But this is where there’s a difference between “adoption” and “foster parenting.”  The goal of adoption is to make permanent change, whereas foster parenting is more of a temporary situation.  To move my analogy into parenthood, the changes made within IT now morph into like that of having your own child.  There are happy and exciting times (walking), there are difficult periods (I’m starting the terrible two’s right now), and there are times when things are just simply “OK.”  But the overall theme in this period is that your organization will never stop growing.  Now we’re getting into the idea of using Continual Service Improvement to adjust to that growth, so IT can adapt to changes and prevent the much feared “spiteful teenager/parent” relationship.

Maybe I gave too much information in this post, but I want to make clear that there’s a lot of work involved with ITIL and IT Service Management, and not all of it is pleasant.  On the other hand, if you want to make permanent changes and to make sure those changes really help improve your organization, get ready to go through your own adoption process.  It won’t be easy, but as Vidal Sassoon once said (who is the original Israeli warrior/hairstylist), “The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary.”

I was driving into work this morning and I started to think about how the evolution of technology has culminated into IT being focused about the delivery of services, and not just the technology that drives it.  I think it’s a fantastic change since it means IT Service Management (which I happily embrace) is more in the spotlight and has gained a lot of popularity these past few years.  The change is easy to explain.  With cloud computing and mobile devices (such as the iPad, which I’m using to write this blog post) people don’t have to focus solely on technology to deliver value.  In fact, IT is now more focused than ever on delivering positive experiences through easy, and natural, interfaces with technology.  Best example is the empire built by the late Steve Jobs.  Apple products are not always the most technologically powerful, but they focus on the user experience.  I don’t think I need to remind anyone on the success of Apple, so for the sake of moving along with this blog post…let’s just go with it.

And what came before the user experience?  That’s right; cloud computing.  Maybe it didn’t come necessarily before it, but the concept of the cloud has helped create a seamless integration of data between different platforms and environments.  A cool user interface is one thing, but the cloud makes technology a cool life interface.

So, what came before “the cloud?”  I would say mobile technology.  Especially these past couple of years, SoC’s have gotten smaller, more powerful, and more efficient.  My iPad is proof of it.  I have access to a computing device that I use to watch movies (duh), play games (duh again), write blog posts and (sometimes) do work – all on a 10 hour battery.  It amazes me that computer chip manufacturers have changed their focus to size and power, making each of those factors as small as possible while still manufacturing their silicon chips to be even more powerful than the previous generation.  In fact, it seemed almost like yesterday that all they cared about was processor speed.

Now I remember how I started thinking about mobile technology:  How great was it when the only thing that mattered with CPU’s was the speed?  I was thinking about how Intel and AMD were the 800 pound gorillas in the technology jungle.  I don’t mean to downplay any advances in other technical areas, such as storage or RAM, but in the late 90’s and early 2000’s, I woke every day in anticipation of hearing the latest and greatest news of CPU breakthroughs.  During this time AMD was squarely beating Intel in the processor race, where a higher gigahertz was all that mattered.  Of course, Intel was able to stage a comeback and their Core 2 offering proved that an efficient architecture made a stronger difference than the sheer amount of electricity that silicon can process.  Moving past the great processor war, CPU’s got miniaturized and were able to fit into smaller and smaller frames. Blackberry, iPhone, Windows Mobile, Android; none would have really gained power in processing without a few select chip manufactures being forced into the mobile market space.  Which ironically, is now more important than what Intel and AMD are bringing to the desktop platforms.

Now, what was I thinking about before my memory of the great Intel vs. AMD war? That’s right, Nirvana’s Smells like Teen Spirit came on the radio, which got me thinking about the 90’s and how technology has change since that time…

Today was our final itSMF local interest group meeting for 2011. Attendance wasn’t as strong as I hoped, but it was good nonetheless. At this meeting I noticed something. Well, actually, it’s something I’ve noticed before; I just want to use the meeting as an excuse to bring up this topic. I’m quiet. In fact, often during phone conferences I’m usually very silent. Don’t worry, I’m not sitting there and breathing heavily like some horror movie villain. Usually I’m taking in all the information and processing the data. Only when things get really quiet and it seems like no one knows what to do, do I answer and give my opinion. There are times this does not work in my favor (like during my participation in the itSMF podcast, in which some vendor kept cutting me off). So, why am I bringing up this wonderful topic of quietness? It’s because 1) I get to kvetch about a personality flaw and 2), I want to point out what type of personality not to have if you’re going to be in IT Service Management. Let me also say that when I describe a “loudmouth,” I don’t mean an obnoxious jerk that you’d find drunk at a bar. I’m meaning more of someone that simply speaks their mind. But I do like the phrase of loudmouth, so it’s going to stay in the title.
Back to topic – I’ve been fortunate to know some pretty brilliant people in the ITSM world, and even have been incredibly fortunate to work with some others. These (very) successful people have a very common trait; they talk. In fact, they not only talk, they lead. In fact, they not only lead, they take control of conversations, give their opinions or ideas, and often give a (sometimes limited) period in which others can express disagreement or concern. That last statement is very important; take control and give opportunity. Why is that such a big deal in ITSM? Think about it. Much of IT Service Management is about “change.” Changing culture, changing processes, changing behaviors…change, change, change (makes me think of “Marsha, Marsha, Marsha…”). With change comes resistance, and honestly, there’s usually more people resisting than the amount of people actually helping to make the change happen. So, being a “loudmouth” isn’t just a personality trait, but rather a useful, and needed, skill.